[Emurlahn]

 Korlat, on Jan 7 2009, 01:01 PM, said:

 Emurlahn, on Jan 7 2009, 05:57 PM, said:

 Korlat, on Jan 7 2009, 12:56 PM, said:

Any chance someone could summarize why Silanah is so high on people's MA lists?

For me, not MA, just Julii.

Yeah...but why?

Because after Thyr's exposure he voted Kessobahn, for whom Thyr was voting (we knew at that point Thyr knew of all his recruits)

 Silanah, on Jan 6 2009, 11:33 AM, said:

Vote: Kessobahn

I think its best we push for a lynch on him as hes the only lead that alot of us agree on.
I dont believe that MA has recruitment powers so with that logic, we should not Lynch Thyrllan until MA is dead.
Then we can lynch him, eliminating both leaders hopefully.

Then, when Rashan (and Rashan alone) went all OMG U Juli!!! on him, he said:

 Silanah, on Jan 6 2009, 12:38 PM, said:

I believe that MA and Octavianus are equal.
But you all seem to think different.
Rashan seems to be acting a symp for Kessobahn to me.
Seems I must hop on the train.
Remove Vote
Vote Thyrllan

Look at the underlined part, it's like "oops, better be more careful".

[Emurlahn]

 Rashan, on Jan 7 2009, 01:04 PM, said:

It would be kind of ironic if he had been the day finder though and that one post and pm he may have sent starting all this

That would blow, I like this day finder thing. It's like playing Russian Roulette

[Silanah]

Oh yeah, forgot it said he was republican
All the same could have been the republican faction's leader
How many people have not posted today? It does not seem like many people have been on since night has ended

[Rashan]

 Path-Shaper, on Jan 3 2009, 06:47 PM, said:

F6) Coroner Finder is in effect: you'll learn player, alt and the faction the player was aligned to at the moment of death.

I do not think we will get the character name.

[Path-Shaper]

The CF for Tennes is everything you'll get once someone dies.

[Emurlahn]

Well then, Thyrllan has to go

[Silanah]

 Emurlahn, on Jan 7 2009, 07:05 AM, said:

 Korlat, on Jan 7 2009, 01:01 PM, said:

 Emurlahn, on Jan 7 2009, 05:57 PM, said:

 Korlat, on Jan 7 2009, 12:56 PM, said:

Any chance someone could summarize why Silanah is so high on people's MA lists?

For me, not MA, just Julii.

Yeah...but why?

Because after Thyr's exposure he voted Kessobahn, for whom Thyr was voting (we knew at that point Thyr knew of all his recruits)

 Silanah, on Jan 6 2009, 11:33 AM, said:

Vote: Kessobahn

I think its best we push for a lynch on him as hes the only lead that alot of us agree on.
I dont believe that MA has recruitment powers so with that logic, we should not Lynch Thyrllan until MA is dead.
Then we can lynch him, eliminating both leaders hopefully.

Then, when Rashan (and Rashan alone) went all OMG U Juli!!! on him, he said:

 Silanah, on Jan 6 2009, 12:38 PM, said:

I believe that MA and Octavianus are equal.
But you all seem to think different.
Rashan seems to be acting a symp for Kessobahn to me.
Seems I must hop on the train.
Remove Vote
Vote Thyrllan

Look at the underlined part, it's like "oops, better be more careful".

I was expecting people to follow suit with lynching him considering nobody seemed to be thinking what I was thinking
Its better to lynch someone rather than no one

[D'riss]

 Rashan, on Jan 7 2009, 11:07 AM, said:

 Path-Shaper, on Jan 3 2009, 06:47 PM, said:

F6) Coroner Finder is in effect: you'll learn player, alt and the faction the player was aligned to at the moment of death.

I do not think we will get the character name.

 Path-Shaper, on Jan 7 2009, 11:08 AM, said:

The CF for Tennes is everything you'll get once someone dies.

 Emurlahn, on Jan 7 2009, 11:09 AM, said:

Well then, Thyrllan has to go

I agree. We can't wait to lynch MA before we lynch Thyr.

[Rashan]

how about a vote and time coutn, mods?

[Emurlahn]

 Silanah, on Jan 7 2009, 01:10 PM, said:

I was expecting people to follow suit with lynching him considering nobody seemed to be thinking what I was thinking
Its better to lynch someone rather than no one

"nobody"? Only Rashan was on and about between your two votes. Sometimes, weak pressure can feel stronger when it hits a spot.

excusatio non petita accusatio manifesta

[Korlat]

This does mean we should get rid of Octavian sooner rather than later, but unless you guys think that MA could get converted (pretty unlikely), we can still wait for a CF to come back Julii before Octavian is a threat. Not saying I'm not going to vote for him, just that I think it's not worth us speed lynching him.

[Silanah]

 Emurlahn, on Jan 7 2009, 07:20 AM, said:

 Silanah, on Jan 7 2009, 01:10 PM, said:

I was expecting people to follow suit with lynching him considering nobody seemed to be thinking what I was thinking
Its better to lynch someone rather than no one

"nobody"? Only Rashan was on and about between your two votes. Sometimes, weak pressure can feel stronger when it hits a spot.

excusatio non petita accusatio manifesta

I was going offline and wasn't back before night began
I felt it was best that I voted for someone that was more lynchable considering I wouldnt be able to explain my choice of vote over the period I was away

[Rashan]

 Korlat, on Jan 7 2009, 11:21 AM, said:

This does mean we should get rid of Octavian sooner rather than later, but unless you guys think that MA could get converted (pretty unlikely), we can still wait for a CF to come back Julii before Octavian is a threat. Not saying I'm not going to vote for him, just that I think it's not worth us speed lynching him.

if octavian cant be recruited its a fair indication no leader can.

[D'riss]

 Korlat, on Jan 7 2009, 11:21 AM, said:

This does mean we should get rid of Octavian sooner rather than later, but unless you guys think that MA could get converted (pretty unlikely), we can still wait for a CF to come back Julii before Octavian is a threat. Not saying I'm not going to vote for him, just that I think it's not worth us speed lynching him.

We don't have to speed lynch him - it's not a question of that.

But all the time he is here, he knows who all the other Julii are (except MA), and he knows how best to interpret their posts, to enhance their arguments, to misconstrue to the rest of us.

For this reason, he cannot be allowed to live past today, going off the information we currently have. Unless someone manages to bring forth some kind of information that changes things, I don't see a better option.

Do you agree, Korlat?

[Path-Shaper]

It is day 2.
There are 31 hours and 30 minutes remaining, a.k.a. plenty of time.

10 votes needed to lynch, 10 votes needed for night.
1 player has voted for Silanah (Kaschan)
4 players have voted for Thyrllan (D'riss, Rashan, Emurlahn, Silanah)
1 players have voted for Rashan (Thyrllan)


13 players have not voted: Omtose, Serc, HP, Gamelon, Ruse, Liosan, Mockra, Korlat, Shadow, Galayn Lord, Kessobahn, Fener, Ampelas

[Korlat]

 Emurlahn, on Jan 7 2009, 06:20 PM, said:

 Silanah, on Jan 7 2009, 01:10 PM, said:

I was expecting people to follow suit with lynching him considering nobody seemed to be thinking what I was thinking
Its better to lynch someone rather than no one

"nobody"? Only Rashan was on and about between your two votes. Sometimes, weak pressure can feel stronger when it hits a spot.

excusatio non petita accusatio manifesta

Well, looking at the way those posts fell it seemed like he reacted to the pressure a bit disproportionately, 'tis true. I shall definitely keep a watch on him - he seems like he's got something to hide, even if it's not necessarily MA-ness.

[Rashan]

people cant bring any information forward until tomorrow, about their role or the mechanics of the game. Indeed people seem disinclined to risk even speaking about the mechanics. this is tmdi 9, which is chosen for uneven cult or mercenary teams. We have two players who openly said they had knowledge to this effect (thyrllan and shadow) and we know from simple maths that the teams started off of a different keel.

[D'riss]

 Rashan, on Jan 7 2009, 11:31 AM, said:

people cant bring any information forward until tomorrow

Of course they can. As you said, Thyrllan and Shadow have both done this already. Others may find a way as well.

[Korlat]

 D'riss, on Jan 7 2009, 06:26 PM, said:

 Korlat, on Jan 7 2009, 11:21 AM, said:

This does mean we should get rid of Octavian sooner rather than later, but unless you guys think that MA could get converted (pretty unlikely), we can still wait for a CF to come back Julii before Octavian is a threat. Not saying I'm not going to vote for him, just that I think it's not worth us speed lynching him.

We don't have to speed lynch him - it's not a question of that.

But all the time he is here, he knows who all the other Julii are (except MA), and he knows how best to interpret their posts, to enhance their arguments, to misconstrue to the rest of us.

For this reason, he cannot be allowed to live past today, going off the information we currently have. Unless someone manages to bring forth some kind of information that changes things, I don't see a better option.

Do you agree, Korlat?

There's an easy remedy to that though - pay him no heed.


But if there's nothing better, it's probably worth me throwing my weight behind it.

[Silanah]

Alright, im off.
It would be nice to see more people in thread before im back