[Fener]

Game- you should stop posting now.

I have to leave, probably for a while. I would be interested to hear other opinions on Rash and Kasch aka "Squiggly Blue Line" Sbl for short

[Gamelon]

 Fener, on Dec 5 2008, 07:57 PM, said:

NAKED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

DKT looks funny naked. He Hairy...like boar!

Idiots.

You all missed my code.

But ignore it, unless youre very curious.

I have a plan.

Ready

[Tennes]

Curious Tennes is curious.
And presently experiencing a curious headache, courtesy of a nice stab in the arm. Im sure none of the people I know would be immature enough to punch it though...

Gonna be around for a little, will read up and give opinions.

[Tennes]

Well, gotta say, I think Ruse has a decent case on Omtose, but I've seen him get a few votes, and we have the whole weekend so im not gonna vote.
As for the people role speculating, that certainly isnt good. It only really helps team scum. I think it was particularly Gam/Mockra wasnt it? As far as I remember, so I may well be wrong, but its interesting that its the two being CI'd, by the reveal. If im wrong and it wasnt those two role speculating, someone please tell me, ive been pretty busy, and havent been paying too much attention to the game.

Edit: And now im off again, cause I just got back and its freezing and I havent had any food for hours. Yeah yeah, I know, sad act playing the mafia before gettin food, but what can I say?

This post has been edited by Tennes: 05 December 2008 - 08:50 PM

[Path-Shaper]

 Tennes, on Dec 5 2008, 09:47 PM, said:

And now im off again, cause I just got back and its freezing and I havent had any food for hours. Yeah yeah, I know, sad act playing the mafia before gettin food, but what can I say?

Silly Tennes. Mafia comes before everything.

[Gamelon]

Indeed. Dead board is dead.

So, P-S, any news?

[Ruse]

I'm here intermittently, but I can't afford to be caught sitting with this open for extended periods of time, I'm afraid.

Plus, those last couple of posts of yours annoyed me for looking too code-y and not containing any content, so I didn't think they were worth replying to.

So, Gamelon, why were you doing some role speculation last game night?

[Gamelon]

 Ruse, on Dec 5 2008, 09:23 PM, said:

I'm here intermittently, but I can't afford to be caught sitting with this open for extended periods of time, I'm afraid.

Plus, those last couple of posts of yours annoyed me for looking too code-y and not containing any content, so I didn't think they were worth replying to.

So, Gamelon, why were you doing some role speculation last game night?

You'll see
I've learnt my lesson from D'riss. I've done a LOT of paranoid role speculation lately, and have started PMing P-S and taking notes bout it, instead of idly speculating on thread, actually. Trust me, when I make a case next, I will be damn sure they are scum.

[Ruse]

 Gamelon, on Dec 5 2008, 09:35 PM, said:

I've learnt my lesson from D'riss. I've done a LOT of paranoid role speculation lately, and have started PMing P-S and taking notes bout it, instead of idly speculating on thread, actually. Trust me, when I make a case next, I will be damn sure they are scum.

Any idea what the ETA on that is?

[Gamelon]

 Ruse, on Dec 5 2008, 09:41 PM, said:

 Gamelon, on Dec 5 2008, 09:35 PM, said:

I've learnt my lesson from D'riss. I've done a LOT of paranoid role speculation lately, and have started PMing P-S and taking notes bout it, instead of idly speculating on thread, actually. Trust me, when I make a case next, I will be damn sure they are scum.

Any idea what the ETA on that is?

Well, as I've hopefully just painted a big target on myself for scum to take out tonight, I have to post one either today or tonight. Thankfully we have the entire weekend for me to say my mind.

[Rashan]

Back and ready to party. Catching up now.

[Rashan]

 Fener, on Dec 5 2008, 08:31 PM, said:

I Just did. He is really obsessing over Gamelon, Mockra, and Kess. Then Mockra reveals and he goes off on a lynch Mockra tirade. Now I can see a couple reasons for this, so on 1 hand I would be inclined to agree with him... but I am not willing to just give him that credit and vote. On the other hand he could be a bat raving mad psycho refrigerator. In my life experiences I have always found that when in doubt... assume someone is a refrigerator. Nothing to scummy, but Rashan IGMEOY until you can properly explain your bloodlust for Mockra. Some others, myself included gave some points on why we shouldn't. What do you say to those posts?

Yeah, I was being emotional. But I wouldn't call it obsessing. I had an eye on Mockra from his case on Gamelon that ended with the Liosan vote and onward. It's so frustrating, because I can't convince you guys about the fact that he's scum, but I am convinced he is. And Gamelon is his accomplice. The fact that I already was fuming over their manipulation of the Liosan lynch, and I couldn't make a decent case out of it; and then Mockra made that 'reveal'. None of it adds up. I just cracked. Well, blew up. Take it as ramblings or whatever you want, I'm not taking any of it back.

If Mockra is telling the truth, he's still a liability. I can't see any scenario in which he won't screw things up for us - there will just be too many uncertainties. IMO we should get rid of those uncertainties ASAP.

And yeah, I am still pissed about the fact that two GB's are dead.


All that aside, can someone elaborate on what the case on Omtose is all about?

The only thing I found was this:

 Omtose, on Dec 4 2008, 12:35 PM, said:

Ha ha ha,
hell, Agree with his reasoning as well.

In fact
remove vote
Vote Liosan

Is there something more than that?

[Ruse]

 Rashan, on Dec 5 2008, 10:12 PM, said:

All that aside, can someone elaborate on what the case on Omtose is all about?

The only thing I found was this:

 Omtose, on Dec 4 2008, 12:35 PM, said:

Ha ha ha,
hell, Agree with his reasoning as well.

In fact
remove vote
Vote Liosan

Is there something more than that?

I made a case against Omtose, at post #554.

[Gamelon]

 Rashan, on Dec 5 2008, 10:12 PM, said:

 Fener, on Dec 5 2008, 08:31 PM, said:

I Just did. He is really obsessing over Gamelon, Mockra, and Kess. Then Mockra reveals and he goes off on a lynch Mockra tirade. Now I can see a couple reasons for this, so on 1 hand I would be inclined to agree with him... but I am not willing to just give him that credit and vote. On the other hand he could be a bat raving mad psycho refrigerator. In my life experiences I have always found that when in doubt... assume someone is a refrigerator. Nothing to scummy, but Rashan IGMEOY until you can properly explain your bloodlust for Mockra. Some others, myself included gave some points on why we shouldn't. What do you say to those posts?

Yeah, I was being emotional. But I wouldn't call it obsessing. I had an eye on Mockra from his case on Gamelon that ended with the Liosan vote and onward. It's so frustrating, because I can't convince you guys about the fact that he's scum, but I am convinced he is. And Gamelon is his accomplice. The fact that I already was fuming over their manipulation of the Liosan lynch, and I couldn't make a decent case out of it; and then Mockra made that 'reveal'. None of it adds up. I just cracked. Well, blew up. Take it as ramblings or whatever you want, I'm not taking any of it back.

If Mockra is telling the truth, he's still a liability. I can't see any scenario in which he won't screw things up for us - there will just be too many uncertainties. IMO we should get rid of those uncertainties ASAP.

And yeah, I am still pissed about the fact that two GB's are dead.


All that aside, can someone elaborate on what the case on Omtose is all about?

The only thing I found was this:

 Omtose, on Dec 4 2008, 12:35 PM, said:

Ha ha ha,
hell, Agree with his reasoning as well.

In fact
remove vote
Vote Liosan

Is there something more than that?

Check through my posts if you want proof I ain't scum
and no, not the obvious "code" one, which isn't a code.
I'm not convinced by Mockra's innocence, either, but I'll get to that later in the day, I'll post the PM I sent to P-S conemplating it, if needed.

Apparently Omtose has been going with the flow and even contradicting his posts to do so. I haven't looked at it in detail but I could swear Omtose wasn't quite that bad. I shall examine it in a while.

[Rashan]

 Ruse, on Dec 5 2008, 11:16 PM, said:

I made a case against Omtose, at post #554.

Summary, correct me if I'm wrong, Omtose seems to be a copycat, and the reasons why he vote isn't exactly clear.

[Rashan]

 Gamelon, on Dec 5 2008, 11:17 PM, said:

Check through my posts if you want proof I ain't scum
and no, not the obvious "code" one, which isn't a code.
I'm not convinced by Mockra's innocence, either, but I'll get to that later in the day, I'll post the PM I sent to P-S conemplating it, if needed.

Apparently Omtose has been going with the flow and even contradicting his posts to do so. I haven't looked at it in detail but I could swear Omtose wasn't quite that bad. I shall examine it in a while.

There's some sort of proof of your innocence somewhere? Care to point me to it?

[Gamelon]

 Rashan, on Dec 5 2008, 10:23 PM, said:

 Gamelon, on Dec 5 2008, 11:17 PM, said:

Check through my posts if you want proof I ain't scum
and no, not the obvious "code" one, which isn't a code.
I'm not convinced by Mockra's innocence, either, but I'll get to that later in the day, I'll post the PM I sent to P-S conemplating it, if needed.

Apparently Omtose has been going with the flow and even contradicting his posts to do so. I haven't looked at it in detail but I could swear Omtose wasn't quite that bad. I shall examine it in a while.

There's some sort of proof of your innocence somewhere? Care to point me to it?

No, I don't think I will. But its there, if someone actually knows the characters of the movie (and I'm defo in it, of which I ain't sure) and wants to go over my posts.

Edit: just checked the characters. Christ, I need to watch that movie more. My character is indeed in it!

This post has been edited by Gamelon: 05 December 2008 - 10:27 PM

[Rashan]

 Gamelon, on Dec 5 2008, 11:26 PM, said:

 Rashan, on Dec 5 2008, 10:23 PM, said:

 Gamelon, on Dec 5 2008, 11:17 PM, said:

Check through my posts if you want proof I ain't scum
and no, not the obvious "code" one, which isn't a code.
I'm not convinced by Mockra's innocence, either, but I'll get to that later in the day, I'll post the PM I sent to P-S conemplating it, if needed.

Apparently Omtose has been going with the flow and even contradicting his posts to do so. I haven't looked at it in detail but I could swear Omtose wasn't quite that bad. I shall examine it in a while.

There's some sort of proof of your innocence somewhere? Care to point me to it?

No, I don't think I will. But its there, if someone actually knows the characters of the movie (and I'm defo in it, of which I ain't sure) and wants to go over my posts.

Are you kidding me? How would anything you put into your own posts prove anything?

Oh, so you know the characters from the movie, oh then you must be innocent. /Sarcasm

[Gamelon]

 Rashan, on Dec 5 2008, 10:29 PM, said:

 Gamelon, on Dec 5 2008, 11:26 PM, said:

 Rashan, on Dec 5 2008, 10:23 PM, said:

 Gamelon, on Dec 5 2008, 11:17 PM, said:

Check through my posts if you want proof I ain't scum
and no, not the obvious "code" one, which isn't a code.
I'm not convinced by Mockra's innocence, either, but I'll get to that later in the day, I'll post the PM I sent to P-S conemplating it, if needed.

Apparently Omtose has been going with the flow and even contradicting his posts to do so. I haven't looked at it in detail but I could swear Omtose wasn't quite that bad. I shall examine it in a while.

There's some sort of proof of your innocence somewhere? Care to point me to it?

No, I don't think I will. But its there, if someone actually knows the characters of the movie (and I'm defo in it, of which I ain't sure) and wants to go over my posts.

Are you kidding me? How would anything you put into your own posts prove anything?

Oh, so you know the characters from the movie, oh then you must be innocent. /Sarcasm

Well, I, for one, am not going to reveal my character fully, for reasons I don't have to explain to you, because quite frankly you can believe Mockra and I or not.
Asking for a full role reveal...Silly, aren't We
or scum?

[Ruse]

 Rashan, on Dec 5 2008, 10:12 PM, said:

 Fener, on Dec 5 2008, 08:31 PM, said:

I Just did. He is really obsessing over Gamelon, Mockra, and Kess. Then Mockra reveals and he goes off on a lynch Mockra tirade. Now I can see a couple reasons for this, so on 1 hand I would be inclined to agree with him... but I am not willing to just give him that credit and vote. On the other hand he could be a bat raving mad psycho refrigerator. In my life experiences I have always found that when in doubt... assume someone is a refrigerator. Nothing to scummy, but Rashan IGMEOY until you can properly explain your bloodlust for Mockra. Some others, myself included gave some points on why we shouldn't. What do you say to those posts?

Yeah, I was being emotional. But I wouldn't call it obsessing. I had an eye on Mockra from his case on Gamelon that ended with the Liosan vote and onward. It's so frustrating, because I can't convince you guys about the fact that he's scum, but I am convinced he is. And Gamelon is his accomplice. The fact that I already was fuming over their manipulation of the Liosan lynch, and I couldn't make a decent case out of it; and then Mockra made that 'reveal'. None of it adds up. I just cracked. Well, blew up. Take it as ramblings or whatever you want, I'm not taking any of it back.

If Mockra is telling the truth, he's still a liability. I can't see any scenario in which he won't screw things up for us - there will just be too many uncertainties. IMO we should get rid of those uncertainties ASAP.

And yeah, I am still pissed about the fact that two GB's are dead.

OK, so if you could explain why it was you suspected Mockra to start with (ie. before the reveal), that would be appreciated. At the moment all I see is a nice case linking Gamelon to Liosan, and then a reveal exonerating Gamelon. So yeah, that sounds kind of suspicious, but the nature of the reveal is such that it's a difficult one to come up with on the spot, which to me indicates that there are only so many ways he could be lying. (Although now that I think of it, there's one I hadn't thought of before. I'll post about it shortly).

The other problem is this: you didn't seem to make any effort to construct a case against Gamelon or Mockra, you just exploded and started making crazy, obsessive remarks (and I don't see how you can call posts like the following anything else).

 Rashan, on Dec 4 2008, 09:38 PM, said:

With Mockra's reveal, I'd like to do either of two things.

1. Lynch Mockra.
2. Lynch Gamelon.

I don't believe a word of the 'neutral' business.

At least one of them has to die. It doesn't matter who of them dies, just choose one. I'm voting for Mockra.

If you think they're lying, you could have at least put some effort into explaining why you think they might be lying, and what you think their lies cover up.

 Rashan, on Dec 4 2008, 09:43 PM, said:

Lynch Mockra Lynch Mockra Lynch Mockra Lynch Mockra Lynch Mockra Lynch Mockra Lynch Mockra Lynch Mockra...

Seriously? 



There are more...I just can't be bothered to paste them in.

The point is, you want anyone to believe you, then stop throwing empty accusations around and start backing them up with something.

EDITTED for spacing.

This post has been edited by Ruse: 05 December 2008 - 10:36 PM