[Path-Shaper]

Day 1, 21.5 h left

17 of you are still alive (Thyrllan, Rashan, Ruse, Kaschan, D'riss, Kessobahn, Korlat, Liosan, Gamelon, Shadow, Tennes, Fener, Silanah, Mockra, Omtose, Emurlahn, Hood's Path)

9 votes to lynch or go to night

3 vote for Kessobahns: Omtose, Liosan, Gamelon
1 vote for D'riss: Korlat

13 people have not voted: Thyrllan, Rashan, Kaschan, D'riss, Shadow, Tennes, Fener, Mockra, Hood's Path, Silanah, Ruse, Kessobahn, Emurlahn

I am going to bed soon, so you may be modless a while.

And the mods would like to remind people that we'll be the judges on who should be modkilled, not some "other boards"

[Kessobahn]

Path-Shaper, on Dec 3 2008, 04:33 PM, said:

Day 1, 21.5 h left

17 of you are still alive (Thyrllan, Rashan, Ruse, Kaschan, D'riss, Kessobahn, Korlat, Liosan, Gamelon, Shadow, Tennes, Fener, Silanah, Mockra, Omtose, Emurlahn, Hood's Path)

9 votes to lynch or go to night

3 vote for Kessobahns: Omtose, Liosan, Gamelon
1 vote for D'riss: Korlat

13 people have not voted: Thyrllan, Rashan, Kaschan, D'riss, Shadow, Tennes, Fener, Mockra, Hood's Path, Silanah, Ruse, Kessobahn, Emurlahn

I am going to bed soon, so you may be modless a while.

And the mods would like to remind people that we'll be the judges on who should be modkilled, not some "other boards"

See you soon PS. lol

[Korlat]

Gamelon, on Dec 3 2008, 10:18 PM, said:

It is the tone. You attacked Kaschan for making a simple observation, put words in his mouth That is bad form, it really ain't on.

You also have to take into account RL matters when it comes down to something like leaving the game for a while. Not everyone is gonna go explaining why they got to stop playing for a number of hours. Could be very personal. Could just be something obvious like work.

Personally, though I stood up against this kinda play earlier, if ya are gonna make yourself a target, a great big vocal target, I've got no problems with lynching you Day One. Better for all of us, as you ain't coming up with any evidence or cases to support this, just commenting on people's lack of playing in Day One. Loudly.

Gamelon, where did Kess attack Kaschan exactly? I seem to have missed this post

Edit: stupid smiley

This post has been edited by Korlat: 03 December 2008 - 09:35 PM

[Kessobahn]

Kessobahn, on Dec 3 2008, 02:08 PM, said:

Kaschan, on Dec 3 2008, 12:08 PM, said:

Coming back in with some coffee, while breakfast cooks.

... there's really nothing to be seen. Kesso is trying too hard ... but there's always at least one or two of the "let's talk game mechanics!" eager beavers on Day 1. I await reliable evidence ...

Let's just hope someone is really, really drunk, because that's pretty much the only way we ever nail scum on Day 1.

Here. Kas, why is it bad. Discussion of any game aspected mechanic(roles, type, etc.) gets people to talk and improves chances of a slip up. Again, scum what everyone to stay in the dark and wonder. In fact, until I get a valid explanation from someone

Remove Vote Vote Kaschan

Its just temporary, but any info is good IMO, and the only "reliable" evidence is the CF. Only way to get this is to kill. (lynch or NK).

Edit: didn't bold

Here.

[Ruse]

My own views on the topic of discussion - quiet innos who make cases, I have no problem with. Quiet innos who don't participate much even when they are around, not so much. I shall be focussing my attentions on them this game, assuming there are any.


Oh and by the way, I like the Western style metaphors and speech patterns, Gamelon!

[Gamelon]

Ruse, on Dec 3 2008, 09:37 PM, said:

My own views on the topic of discussion - quiet innos who make cases, I have no problem with. Quiet innos who don't participate much even when they are around, not so much. I shall be focussing my attentions on them this game, assuming there are any.


Oh and by the way, I like the Western style metaphors and speech patterns, Gamelon!

Tarnation, don't tell me I've been alt-guessed already?

[Ruse]

Gamelon, on Dec 3 2008, 09:39 PM, said:

Ruse, on Dec 3 2008, 09:37 PM, said:

My own views on the topic of discussion - quiet innos who make cases, I have no problem with. Quiet innos who don't participate much even when they are around, not so much. I shall be focussing my attentions on them this game, assuming there are any.


Oh and by the way, I like the Western style metaphors and speech patterns, Gamelon!

Tarnation, don't tell me I've been alt-guessed already?

Don't tell me...Butch Cassidy, right?*






*Disclaimer: Ruse has not actually seen Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid, and consequently does not have 100% faith in his assertion that the BC in question actually spoke like that.

[Korlat]

Gamelon, on Dec 3 2008, 10:18 PM, said:

It is the tone. You attacked Kaschan for making a simple observation, put words in his mouth That is bad form, it really ain't on.

You also have to take into account RL matters when it comes down to something like leaving the game for a while. Not everyone is gonna go explaining why they got to stop playing for a number of hours. Could be very personal. Could just be something obvious like work.

Personally, though I stood up against this kinda play earlier, if ya are gonna make yourself a target, a great big vocal target, I've got no problems with lynching you Day One. Better for all of us, as you ain't coming up with any evidence or cases to support this, just commenting on people's lack of playing in Day One. Loudly.

Kessobahn, on Dec 3 2008, 02:08 PM, said:

Kaschan, on Dec 3 2008, 12:08 PM, said:

Coming back in with some coffee, while breakfast cooks.

... there's really nothing to be seen. Kesso is trying too hard ... but there's always at least one or two of the "let's talk game mechanics!" eager beavers on Day 1. I await reliable evidence ...

Let's just hope someone is really, really drunk, because that's pretty much the only way we ever nail scum on Day 1.

Here. Kas, why is it bad. Discussion of any game aspected mechanic(roles, type, etc.) gets people to talk and improves chances of a slip up. Again, scum what everyone to stay in the dark and wonder. In fact, until I get a valid explanation from someone

Remove Vote Vote Kaschan

Its just temporary, but any info is good IMO, and the only "reliable" evidence is the CF. Only way to get this is to kill. (lynch or NK).

Edit: didn't bold

umm.... ok looking at the underlined bit in Gamelon's post and Kess's 'attack', I fail to see the putting words in Kaschan's mouth bit. Also I think the use of the word attack was a little strong which is probably why I missed this in the first place.

[Gamelon]

Korlat, on Dec 3 2008, 09:47 PM, said:

Gamelon, on Dec 3 2008, 10:18 PM, said:

It is the tone. You attacked Kaschan for making a simple observation, put words in his mouth That is bad form, it really ain't on.

You also have to take into account RL matters when it comes down to something like leaving the game for a while. Not everyone is gonna go explaining why they got to stop playing for a number of hours. Could be very personal. Could just be something obvious like work.

Personally, though I stood up against this kinda play earlier, if ya are gonna make yourself a target, a great big vocal target, I've got no problems with lynching you Day One. Better for all of us, as you ain't coming up with any evidence or cases to support this, just commenting on people's lack of playing in Day One. Loudly.

Kessobahn, on Dec 3 2008, 02:08 PM, said:

Kaschan, on Dec 3 2008, 12:08 PM, said:

Coming back in with some coffee, while breakfast cooks.

... there's really nothing to be seen. Kesso is trying too hard ... but there's always at least one or two of the "let's talk game mechanics!" eager beavers on Day 1. I await reliable evidence ...

Let's just hope someone is really, really drunk, because that's pretty much the only way we ever nail scum on Day 1.

Here. Kas, why is it bad. Discussion of any game aspected mechanic(roles, type, etc.) gets people to talk and improves chances of a slip up. Again, scum what everyone to stay in the dark and wonder. In fact, until I get a valid explanation from someone

Remove Vote Vote Kaschan

Its just temporary, but any info is good IMO, and the only "reliable" evidence is the CF. Only way to get this is to kill. (lynch or NK).

Edit: didn't bold

umm.... ok looking at the underlined bit in Gamelon's post and Kess's 'attack', I fail to see the putting words in Kaschan's mouth bit. Also I think the use of the word attack was a little strong which is probably why I missed this in the first place.

Well, might be I spoke a bit strongly against him there. But he did accuse Kaschan of saying discussion of mechanics was "bad", which ain't anything like what he actually said.

And dang, my real account has been found out.

[Liosan]

There is stuff all to look at right now. Which is why day one is random. *sigh*

[Korlat]

Gamelon, on Dec 3 2008, said:

Well, might be I spoke a bit strongly against him there. But he did accuse Kaschan of saying discussion of mechanics was "bad", which ain't anything like what he actually said.

And dang, my real account has been found out.

It has? Whodunnit?

Fair enough... I guess

[Ruse]

Korlat, on Dec 3 2008, 09:55 PM, said:

Gamelon, on Dec 3 2008, said:

Well, might be I spoke a bit strongly against him there. But he did accuse Kaschan of saying discussion of mechanics was "bad", which ain't anything like what he actually said.

And dang, my real account has been found out.

It has? Whodunnit?

Fair enough... I guess

Ruse, on Dec 3 2008, 09:40 PM, said:

Gamelon, on Dec 3 2008, 09:39 PM, said:

Ruse, on Dec 3 2008, 09:37 PM, said:

My own views on the topic of discussion - quiet innos who make cases, I have no problem with. Quiet innos who don't participate much even when they are around, not so much. I shall be focussing my attentions on them this game, assuming there are any.


Oh and by the way, I like the Western style metaphors and speech patterns, Gamelon!

Tarnation, don't tell me I've been alt-guessed already?

Don't tell me...Butch Cassidy, right?*

*Disclaimer: Ruse has not actually seen Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid, and consequently does not have 100% faith in his assertion that the BC in question actually spoke like that.

For your convenience .




I feel like it's worth trying to open avenues of discussion, even if they're slightly more spammy, because at the moment all this focus on one issue is rather distracting.

So instead, any particularly nasty ghosts from Ghostbusters we should be worried about? I haven't actually seen the film, so I don't know what we're up against...

[Thyrllan]

Ruse, on Dec 3 2008, 10:07 PM, said:

So instead, any particularly nasty ghosts from Ghostbusters we should be worried about? I haven't actually seen the film, so I don't know what we're up against...

vote Ruse for the lame ass question. And for not watching the best film ever made (in 1984).

[Path-Shaper]

Day 1, about 20 and a half h left

17 of you are still alive (Thyrllan, Rashan, Ruse, Kaschan, D'riss, Kessobahn, Korlat, Liosan, Gamelon, Shadow, Tennes, Fener, Silanah, Mockra, Omtose, Emurlahn, Hood's Path)

9 votes to lynch or go to night

3 vote for Kessobahns: Omtose, Liosan, Gamelon
1 vote for D'riss: Korlat
1 vote for Ruse: Thyrllan

12 people have not voted: Rashan, Kaschan, D'riss, Shadow, Tennes, Fener, Mockra, Hood's Path, Silanah, Ruse, Kessobahn, Emurlahn

this mod's gonna go grab some food, and then go write his exam. You may be modless, dunno for how long.
play nice!

[Tennes]

Kessobahn, on Dec 3 2008, 07:33 PM, said:

Liosan, on Dec 3 2008, 03:16 AM, said:

Vote Omtose for voting an account for a previous game. ^^

which is Liosans only post and this was 6 hours ago.

So no, I am not against low posters, I am against people who refuse to contribute out of a self preservation mode, that only helps the fuking killers.

Kess' attitude really isnt helping innos. If you are one, then you're doing nothing to help, by spreading so much confusion, drawing so much attention by agression etc.

This post, for example, stinks of bullshit.

How the hell do you judge someone with 1 post, as having a self preservation complex, as opposed to being a low poster. 1 post, to me, says low poster. Deliberate non confrontationalness, trying to appear helpful, while posting a bit, says self preservation, as someone trying to survive, probably wouldnt want noticed for being a low poster.

Also, low poster is kinda neutral, whereas someone trying purely to survive, will probably want not to be seen as neutral, but as helpful, and will be trying to get down as PI.

[Liosan]

I can see this being a lynch-less day one, atm.

But there isn't anyone who's done anything worthy of notice! Except the Kess shit. Still, I can't see a symp or killer trying to waste themselves on day one like this, though.

[Gamelon]

Lord in the heavens above. I go away for a dang long time and we have 6 posts, and one more from the Mod?

Slow as a mule in a very big desert.

[Kessobahn]

Ruse, on Dec 3 2008, 05:07 PM, said:

Korlat, on Dec 3 2008, 09:55 PM, said:

Gamelon, on Dec 3 2008, said:

Well, might be I spoke a bit strongly against him there. But he did accuse Kaschan of saying discussion of mechanics was "bad", which ain't anything like what he actually said.

And dang, my real account has been found out.

It has? Whodunnit?

Fair enough... I guess

Yet the vote stays. Kas said he would rather wait on "reliable" info. Does e really have to say the word bad. Really? But as I said before, you explained why it might be and I removed the vote because it made sense.

Ruse, on Dec 3 2008, 09:40 PM, said:

Gamelon, on Dec 3 2008, 09:39 PM, said:

Ruse, on Dec 3 2008, 09:37 PM, said:

My own views on the topic of discussion - quiet innos who make cases, I have no problem with. Quiet innos who don't participate much even when they are around, not so much. I shall be focussing my attentions on them this game, assuming there are any.


Oh and by the way, I like the Western style metaphors and speech patterns, Gamelon!

Tarnation, don't tell me I've been alt-guessed already?

Don't tell me...Butch Cassidy, right?*

*Disclaimer: Ruse has not actually seen Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid, and consequently does not have 100% faith in his assertion that the BC in question actually spoke like that.

For your convenience .




I feel like it's worth trying to open avenues of discussion, even if they're slightly more spammy, because at the moment all this focus on one issue is rather distracting.

So instead, any particularly nasty ghosts from Ghostbusters we should be worried about? I haven't actually seen the film, so I don't know what we're up against...

So its cool if you spam to start debates and discussions, but when I do it, I am causing a scene and being a hindrence to innos. If you will notice I stopped spamming and started pointing out other peoples issues.(Note: this isn't at Ruse and Korlat, its a generalization, no one has voted you for disrupting the flow of the game and being a hindrince to the innos. Food for thoght, IMO.

Thyrllan, on Dec 3 2008, 05:19 PM, said:

Ruse, on Dec 3 2008, 10:07 PM, said:

So instead, any particularly nasty ghosts from Ghostbusters we should be worried about? I haven't actually seen the film, so I don't know what we're up against...

vote Ruse for the lame ass question. And for not watching the best film ever made (in 1984).

Joke vote, is cool, glad to see you hr, just wanted to ask your input thus far on all my bullsit.

Tennes, on Dec 3 2008, 05:28 PM, said:

Kessobahn, on Dec 3 2008, 07:33 PM, said:

Liosan, on Dec 3 2008, 03:16 AM, said:

Vote Omtose for voting an account for a previous game. ^^

which is Liosans only post and this was 6 hours ago.

So no, I am not against low posters, I am against people who refuse to contribute out of a self preservation mode, that only helps the fuking killers.

Kess' attitude really isnt helping innos. If you are one, then you're doing nothing to help, by spreading so much confusion, drawing so much attention by agression etc.

This post, for example, stinks of bullshit.

How the hell do you judge someone with 1 post, as having a self preservation complex, as opposed to being a low poster. 1 post, to me, says low poster. Deliberate non confrontationalness, trying to appear helpful, while posting a bit, says self preservation, as someone trying to survive, probably wouldnt want noticed for being a low poster.

Also, low poster is kinda neutral, whereas someone trying purely to survive, will probably want not to be seen as neutral, but as helpful, and will be trying to get down as PI.

Post the whole quote, then say it again. The last line wasn't about Lio, it was about the whole post. That was putting words in my mouth, but its cool, I can see how you might interpret them together

Liosan, on Dec 3 2008, 05:38 PM, said:

I can see this being a lynch-less day one, atm.

But there isn't anyone who's done anything worthy of notice! Except the Kess shit. Still, I can't see a symp or killer trying to waste themselves on day one like this, though.

Don't think the last 5 hours has been shit. When I am done catching up I will give you some good data points. And no, I see a quick end of day lynch happening.

Gamelon, on Dec 3 2008, 05:44 PM, said:

Lord in the heavens above. I go away for a dang long time and we have 6 posts, and one more from the Mod?

Slow as a mule in a very big desert.

See what happens when I am gone. Regret telling me to shut up? lol.

[Kessobahn]

Notes on the game from my perspective. No need to defend these arent accusations, just talking points for later

• I spam, and get called out for padding my post count on the first serious post I make
  
• I call out Lio in a post and he blows up saying my assumtion was wrong and giving a reason for voting me other than that
  
• I point out that he never made it clear thus my assumption
  
• he says he did give a reason
  
• I ask him where he gave it
  
• he says in the post after the vote
  
• I say but the point is you blew up because I guessed wrongly about why you voted me
  
• he says he did give a reason
  
• point is, he blew up when I questioned his weak case and pointed at him,

thats my case on Lio

• Gamelon says I am too agressive and attack people
  
• I point out that its not an attack
  
• he removes vote
  
• I ask Kas a question in a non theatening way
  
• Game says I attack Kas and votes me
  
• Korlat asks where I attacked him
  
• I point it out
  
• Korlat agrees it wasn't an attack
  
• Gamelon grudgingly agrees and leaves the vote on because the word bad was never used by Kas

There is my case on Game

Throughout the last 5 hours I have been drawing things to the surface. Use it. Ignre the fodder, look at the posts, think this way, if I hadn't been so angry would anyone have voted me? NO, but they wouldn't have reacted in the manner they did either. I am doing this and spamming and talking to draw you all out, get you involved, at least if everyone hates me, you can all discuss my lynch and get info from each other, I appologize if you think I am too hard, but FFS I said it before, I'll say it again, Inno's shouldn't have to try and lay low. So I don't. Look at the heat and repression, shut him up, he is drawing attention from the killers. BS, I am drawing the killers out. I bet my mafia card Lio is scum. Game is consistent in his not liking my playstyle, so I cut him slack. Emur is probaby scum, because he advocates a silent game, never cool. there, I am done. I know I say alot, but I have nothing to lose. Its not like I am a Jester.

[Gamelon]

Kessobahn, on Dec 3 2008, 11:24 PM, said:

Notes on the game from my perspective. No need to defend these arent accusations, just talking points for later

• I spam, and get called out for padding my post count on the first serious post I make
  
• I call out Lio in a post and he blows up saying my assumtion was wrong and giving a reason for voting me other than that
  
• I point out that he never made it clear thus my assumption
  
• he says he did give a reason
  
• I ask him where he gave it
  
• he says in the post after the vote
  
• I say but the point is you blew up because I guessed wrongly about why you voted me
  
• he says he did give a reason
  
• point is, he blew up when I questioned his weak case and pointed at him,

thats my case on Lio

• Gamelon says I am too agressive and attack people
  
• I point out that its not an attack
  
• he removes vote
  
• I ask Kas a question in a non theatening way
  
• Game says I attack Kas and votes me
  
• Korlat asks where I attacked him
  
• I point it out
  
• Korlat agrees it wasn't an attack
  
• Gamelon grudgingly agrees and leaves the vote on because the word bad was never used by Kas

There is my case on Game

Throughout the last 5 hours I have been drawing things to the surface. Use it. Ignre the fodder, look at the posts, think this way, if I hadn't been so angry would anyone have voted me? NO, but they wouldn't have reacted in the manner they did either. I am doing this and spamming and talking to draw you all out, get you involved, at least if everyone hates me, you can all discuss my lynch and get info from each other, I appologize if you think I am too hard, but FFS I said it before, I'll say it again, Inno's shouldn't have to try and lay low. So I don't. Look at the heat and repression, shut him up, he is drawing attention from the killers. BS, I am drawing the killers out. I bet my mafia card Lio is scum. Game is consistent in his not liking my playstyle, so I cut him slack. Emur is probaby scum, because he advocates a silent game, never cool. there, I am done. I know I say alot, but I have nothing to lose. Its not like I am a Jester.

Actually, I never said why I left my vote on ya, and I'll tell y'all now. It's cus I don't like your general play style. It ain't helpful, and you've been claiming lot of credit for a lot of nothing. What have ya drawn to the surface? Nothing. Far as I can see, all ya got is a lot of eyes set on yourself. I certainly ain't inno'd you, for all I know you could be an FM sympathiser.

Notice the big writing, peoples?
Its Day One. 17 Hours in, and Kessobahn here thinks he has found us some scum.
I am sceptical of yer incredible daytime perceptive finder abilities.