Tennes, on Dec 9 2008, 04:44 AM, said:
The curtains flew and then he appeared, saying dont be afraid...
Im here.
vote kaschan
mainly for trying not to lynch dana, as soon as she revealed, and then hopping on later.
So because he didn't jump the gun and wanted to think things through, then deciding to vote makes him Scum? Look I am not trying to defend Kasch here, and D'riss' case does shed some light on some admittedly odd behavior, but Tennes reasoning is flawed and to me looks like he is just voting to vote. Dana in the movie was a good guy for like 3/4 of the movie. Only when she got possesed did she turn evil. ( I might venture to say that one of the GB powers might be to un posses Louis and Dana) in all probability Lish didn't get turned night one and was inno at the time of the lynch. At first I didn't want to lynch her because this. Only after the discussion and talking it out it became pretty obvious that she would become possesable (that from the mouth of one of our dead ghostbusters) and had to go if only to keep her from the scum. If that behavior is a lynchable offense then I am up for lynch next.
D'riss, on Dec 9 2008, 10:30 AM, said:
I think my most coherent case was in this post:
D'riss, on Dec 8 2008, 12:06 PM, said:
Kaschan, on Dec 8 2008, 10:02 AM, said:
Headed off to bed soon. Looks like everyone's just kind of shuffling their feet, wondering if we should lynch people who aren't really scum ... but, well, aren't really Inno. I think Mockra probably already is scum, and is playing some kind of game with us. No idea how much truth or untruth there is to Mockra and Gamelon's stories, or Kesso's not-too-subtly encoded maybe reveal.
Does that look like a guy who wants to get involved in the game? No, it looks like a guy who's trying to stall a lynch.
He gets called:
Kaschan, on Dec 8 2008, 10:56 AM, said:
Oh, I'm still here. I just hate to put someone at L-1 right before I leave for a while, especially without a mod around.
Lack of resolution and all that.
So why are you waiting to be "right before you leave for a while" to vote? You were around an hour earlier.
But now HP calls you out:
Kaschan, on Dec 8 2008, 10:58 AM, said:
In fact, now that we've got six people on, and I won't have to wait long:
Vote Gamelon
Where's the mod? Nowhere, so even if a hammer comes you won't get "resolution" any more than when you made your first post.
Like I said, it makes no sense. But let's see Gamelon's CF first.
Add his morning vote-Mockra-then-buh-bye antics.
@ D'riss ok, this makes more sense. I just don't know if a killer it makes. Seems kind of weak.
at the moment I would like to look at others, but we only have 10 hours left and I am not sure I will be around for a lynch. So I might have to leave it on Kaschan if only to get a lynch. I'm just not convinced he is scum.
Does anyone else find Tennes reason for voting a bit contrived? Add to that the fact that after I voted Tennes and accused him of not playing, he pops on and has basically been running the thread since then. Does no one see this? or is it just be because I am biased?
At the moment there are 5 votes on Kasch I am betting we have 1 killer on that train and one not on the train. That leaves in my eyes (original killers, I am discounting Mockra as he might be bad, but not a killer) , Tennes and D'riss on the train, and Kasch, Rash, Korlat, and Emur off. D'riss has been squeaky clean up to this point which in and of itself is unsettling, Tennes has just been argumentative and sowing confusion.
Of the 4 off train: Kasch has his shady behavior, Rash claims RI but can't back it up, Korlat......, Emur is kind of an enigma. He was convinced Kess was a symp, which isn't the case, but based on his behavior I thought so too. But iirc thats really the only case he made. Ruse did you find anything on Emur?