[Mockra]

well i made a case on gam day one and guarded him, so either way having the gatekeeper gone is a good thing and even though i dont know my alignment i am playing for the innos. I cant harm my faction if i dont know which it is. At the end of the day i am a guard and can guard people, if we choose well i will be an inno guard. tonight i have said i am guarding rashan, but i might not guard anyone as the killer woill just withhold if i do and rashan would be lynched tomorrow and we may lose a goodie because of my reveal.

So i am just not doing nay night action until we are certain of a baddie.

[Korlat]

Ok, it has been a while since I watched the movie, but didn't Zuul possess Dana? Or did Zuul allow the Gatekeeper into her?

Either way, I am happy with the lynch, for reasons previously stated and as for the person crying in the corner it would have to either be Louis/The Keymaster (or Gatekeeper) or Venkman.

Atm I think I am going to look back over Tennes, can't seem to remember much from him.

[Korlat]

Tennes, on Dec 5 2008, 12:26 AM, said:

And whats the "liability" with that.
That means good gains a guard. Although im not sure what I am. Neutral I guess, but then, does that mean we're against the GBs aswell? If they're a seperate team. Im gonna guess that they're basically on our team, but more actively good, as its a deliberate act of evil to guard one, unlike a RI, therefore, RI wouldnt change his alignment? It also means he knows the name of scum(whoever he guarded).

That was quick and I notice Tennes was also gone the whole weekend.

Note the underlined bit, Omtose, Fener you guys are RIs with a generic name, your role pm says you are good right?

[Mockra]

Korlat, on Dec 8 2008, 01:04 PM, said:

Tennes, on Dec 5 2008, 12:26 AM, said:

And whats the "liability" with that.
That means good gains a guard. Although im not sure what I am. Neutral I guess, but then, does that mean we're against the GBs aswell? If they're a seperate team. Im gonna guess that they're basically on our team, but more actively good, as its a deliberate act of evil to guard one, unlike a RI, therefore, RI wouldnt change his alignment? It also means he knows the name of scum(whoever he guarded).

That was quick and I notice Tennes was also gone the whole weekend.

Note the underlined bit, Omtose, Fener you guys are RIs with a generic name, your role pm says you are good right?

ha, are you not ri with generic name and told you are good?

that sounds like a question, so are you saying your not RI? not trying to out a roled inno, but you just asked a question about being ri in a way thats suggests your not RI.

[Korlat]

Well don't worry about outing a roled inno, I have nothing special but a character name and good in my PM

[Omtose]

browser posted my post like 10 times

This post has been edited by Omtose: 08 December 2008 - 01:39 PM

[Korlat]

Actually something has occurred to me, these guys that have claimed a generic name, it could be an attempt by scum to hide in plain sight, while I know its a stretch, I just feel its something that might be worth thinking about.

After all in a game like this there should be a largish block of scum. In which case all of them (or almost all of them) claiming RI while risky could be a very good ruse and could potentially by them a few days.

As I see it, I can see them doing it to try and keep themselves alive and this would require them to be able to comm off thread.
On the other hand, its possible Yellow could not find enough characters to give everyone a name. While I lean towards this, my experience has taught me to think a little outside the box.

[Omtose]

Mockra, on Dec 8 2008, 08:14 AM, said:

Korlat, on Dec 8 2008, 01:04 PM, said:

Tennes, on Dec 5 2008, 12:26 AM, said:

And whats the "liability" with that.
That means good gains a guard. Although im not sure what I am. Neutral I guess, but then, does that mean we're against the GBs aswell? If they're a seperate team. Im gonna guess that they're basically on our team, but more actively good, as its a deliberate act of evil to guard one, unlike a RI, therefore, RI wouldnt change his alignment? It also means he knows the name of scum(whoever he guarded).

That was quick and I notice Tennes was also gone the whole weekend.

Note the underlined bit, Omtose, Fener you guys are RIs with a generic name, your role pm says you are good right?

ha, are you not ri with generic name and told you are good?

that sounds like a question, so are you saying your not RI? not trying to out a roled inno, but you just asked a question about being ri in a way thats suggests your not RI.

Well now, what i am wondering is why you never asked this of Shadow when he was speculating on what RI's have written in there pm's just now.
Yet you feel obliged to "out" Korlat as a potential roled player. Seems to me you are perhaps trying to signal to your master that korlat could be roled.
You ignored Shadow doing something similar though...so perhaps shadow is one of the guys you are trying to signal?....hmmm

Strange double standard there.



edit - this is the multi post in all its glory

This post has been edited by Omtose: 08 December 2008 - 01:40 PM

[Shadow]

I know what RI's have in their role PM's I was commenting on that fact that everyone kept jumping on Gamelon because he had a name, now I know the RI name isnt really a proper name but it is still a name. And yes I should have remembered that it does indeed say that RI's are goodies in regard to Mokras claim but I didnt think to go back and check it.

[Korlat]

ummmm..... Omtose, are you having technical difficulties or this just emphasis?

[Korlat]

Shadow, on Dec 8 2008, 03:35 PM, said:

I know what RI's have in their role PM's I was commenting on that fact that everyone kept jumping on Gamelon because he had a name, now I know the RI name isnt really a proper name but it is still a name. And yes I should have remembered that it does indeed say that RI's are goodies in regard to Mokras claim but I didnt think to go back and check it.

Hmm... maybe I am not remembering where exactly you posted this, but I believe that it was the name he revealed that ultimately got him lynched. While Dana may have been innocent, its reasonable to assume that she might been possessible by Gozer.

[Mockra]

tbh i didnt even notice shadow had posted.

[Shadow]

Yeah I wasnt sure, havent actually had a chance to check back over the pages since 18, so I think I just caught the end and it appeared like people were thinking he was guilty just because he had a name.

[Mockra]

tbh i didnt even notice shadow had posted.

[Kessobahn]

Uggg.Am I dead yet? gonna get some coffe and catch up

[Omtose]

Mockra, on Dec 8 2008, 08:43 AM, said:

tbh i didnt even notice shadow had posted.

nice t know i am not the only one experiencing technical difficulties

[Kessobahn]

so Its night, good job on the Game lynch. NOw what? I am all for lynching me with as badly as I've played. anyway, back later.

[Korlat]

@Omtose: I am having similar problems, while I have figured out how to avoid double posting, I am having to try and post stuff 3 or 4 times before it works.

[D'riss]

I find it unsettling to see all these multi-posts in a Ghostbuster game.

[Kessobahn]

Korlat, on Dec 8 2008, 08:58 AM, said:

@Omtose: I am having similar problems, while I have figured out how to avoid double posting, I am having to try and post stuff 3 or 4 times before it works.

How do you avoid double posting?