[Tennes]

Shadow, on Nov 12 2008, 03:24 PM, said:

Tennes, on Nov 12 2008, 10:20 AM, said:

Galain, on Nov 12 2008, 03:17 PM, said:

Tennes, on Nov 12 2008, 05:15 PM, said:

Well I have more information now that it is day. First off I am the vig that took out D'riss. I thought that Ando's early vote and then vote removal 19 minutes later was a attempt to distance. So that it that. But more importantly my lost dog (vorax) did a find on a person that person then killed him. Vorax's last thought sent his find to me. Rashan is a IVET and a dog killing scum. So with out further adu


Vote Rashan

You say that you have a dog (=finding activity) and that you lost it when investigating Rashan, so Rashan is a killer?

I had a dog and we were looking for each other. If we had found each other then we would have been partners. He was my bond animal. I found out this morning that Vorax did a find on Rashan and that then Rashan killed him. Vorax's last thought was to send me the identity of his killer also the person he did a find on. If Vorax had been able to do a find on me then we could have talked off line. As it is I blow my vig and then my lost partner died.

Now, that's cool, and seems I owe a certain someone an apology after CF
Sidenote: pretty bloodthirsty to unleash a day 1 vig.

No so much bloodthirsty as worried that I would get got before I had a chance to use it. I went back over the thread 3 times before I decided on D'riss. I will happily allow myself to by lynch if my message from PS was wrong.

[Galain]

Using your vig kill is not something that's part of your winning conditions, you know


edit: wait, that's a dibs game, so what do I know. Nevermind

This post has been edited by Galain: 12 November 2008 - 03:35 PM

[Telas]

Serc, on Nov 12 2008, 04:28 PM, said:

Galain, on Nov 12 2008, 03:24 PM, said:

Serc, on Nov 12 2008, 05:22 PM, said:

I don't like this. Not one bit.

Man, you really are paranoid.

Tennes reveals a story where's he's 100% sure Rashan is killer.

This is a CF game, it's day 2, we already nailed a killer. Watchugo'ondo?

Of course I'm paranoid. Its Mafia, not a tea party.
"Sticking feathers up your butt does not make you a chicken."
Saying you are a vig and that you have a partner does not make it true.
I'd like to draw everyone's attention to JA's vig reveal in 32. We can't take every reveal as gospel.

Editted for grammar

I don't know if I believe all the specifics of his reveal, but there is one bit that can be easily tested the bit where Rashan is a killer. Since I believed Rashan to be scum before any reveals I'm quite happy to lynch Rashan to test this.

Another point, who was it that did the funky stuff with mindlinking and suchlike. Because if its not the Innos then we should probably lynch Tennes anyway.

[Galain]

Telas, on Nov 12 2008, 05:35 PM, said:

I don't know if I believe all the specifics of his reveal, but there is one bit that can be easily tested the bit where Rashan is a killer. Since I believed Rashan to be scum before any reveals I'm quite happy to lynch Rashan to test this.

Another point, who was it that did the funky stuff with mindlinking and suchlike. Because if its not the Innos then we should probably lynch Tennes anyway.

I'm more worried about the idea of a dog coming back to possess me.

Reality Disfunction tome 4: Vortax's revenge

[Serc]

I'm considering lynching him now. A big, long convoluted explanation about a finder finding Rashan was a killer then his "last thoughts" being forwarded by PS to Tennes? It would have been simpler and less suspect to say "I vigged D'riss because I thought he was distancing from Ano".

I'll vote Rashan also, though. It just seems to easy. Both killers gone in two days thanks to a lucky lynch and then a "reveal".

[Rashan]

Unsurprisingly I'm against lynching me to test any god damned theory, let a lone a hare brained one that relied on the convenience of a fucking dead dog
(thats not a dog that died fucking but a fucking dead can not talk to us dead dog)
Am I the only one who spots the convenience of the partners death, and the fact that I purportedly killed him, the wonder dog (stealing lassies well won title) also confirms that in a flash of genious akin to telling the farmer the missing child is in fact down the well, that the dog investigated his murderer, and spo was able to double connfirm my purported guilt in his dying thoughts.
Me thinks you are over egging the pudding my good tennes.
Now tennes is under no pressure, so its meanas or galain that hes protecting, my votes on galain, but meanas is suspicious enough that i'll happily switch to a vote from him.
My interpretawiotn is that this is a gutsy symp play on tennes part

[Tennes]

Telas, on Nov 12 2008, 03:35 PM, said:

Serc, on Nov 12 2008, 04:28 PM, said:

Galain, on Nov 12 2008, 03:24 PM, said:

Serc, on Nov 12 2008, 05:22 PM, said:

I don't like this. Not one bit.

Man, you really are paranoid.

Tennes reveals a story where's he's 100% sure Rashan is killer.

This is a CF game, it's day 2, we already nailed a killer. Watchugo'ondo?

Of course I'm paranoid. Its Mafia, not a tea party.
"Sticking feathers up your butt does not make you a chicken."
Saying you are a vig and that you have a partner does not make it true.
I'd like to draw everyone's attention to JA's vig reveal in 32. We can't take every reveal as gospel.

Editted for grammar

I don't know if I believe all the specifics of his reveal, but there is one bit that can be easily tested the bit where Rashan is a killer. Since I believed Rashan to be scum before any reveals I'm quite happy to lynch Rashan to test this.

Another point, who was it that did the funky stuff with mindlinking and suchlike. Because if its not the Innos then we should probably lynch Tennes anyway.

Vorax linked with me. Cause according to PS he was my bonded animal.

I assume that he is a character from the book for those of you who know the book, my character is XXXXXXXXXXX


edit by mod - no names please

This post has been edited by Path-Shaper: 12 November 2008 - 03:44 PM

[Tennes]

Rashan, on Nov 12 2008, 03:40 PM, said:

Unsurprisingly I'm against lynching me to test any god damned theory, let a lone a hare brained one that relied on the convenience of a fucking dead dog
(thats not a dog that died fucking but a fucking dead can not talk to us dead dog)
Am I the only one who spots the convenience of the partners death, and the fact that I purportedly killed him, the wonder dog (stealing lassies well won title) also confirms that in a flash of genious akin to telling the farmer the missing child is in fact down the well, that the dog investigated his murderer, and spo was able to double connfirm my purported guilt in his dying thoughts.
Me thinks you are over egging the pudding my good tennes.
Now tennes is under no pressure, so its meanas or galain that hes protecting, my votes on galain, but meanas is suspicious enough that i'll happily switch to a vote from him.
My interpretawiotn is that this is a gutsy symp play on tennes part

Well since I am not defending either of them and am instead only going after you misserable murdering scum then NO it is not a play by me.

[Shadow]

Wait a sec. You said you received the person he investigated, and the identity of his killer. Both were Rashan, yes?
Since you vigged D'riss, that means your dog was either Barghast or Tellan. Neither ever appeared on my radar (tellan only because of his admitted reluctance to play), so this is massive coincidence that the killer also went for that particular one. It sounds almost like a triggered kill or something (like the predator had in the Aliens game).

Did you receive the alignment: i.e. "Vorax was killed by Rashan, an Ivet", or just "Rashan is the one who killed your partner when he investigated him?" and you added yourself that the Ivets are the killers?

I doubt you'd make a reveal that you know is fucked up, but you may have received info that's not what you think it is, which could be costly.
Can't wait for what the CF is going to say.

[Telas]

Serc, on Nov 12 2008, 04:38 PM, said:

I'm considering lynching him now. A big, long convoluted explanation about a finder finding Rashan was a killer then his"last thoughts" being forwarded by PS to Tennes? It would have been simpler and less suspect to say "I vigged D'riss because I thought he was distancing from Ano".

I'll vote Rashan also, though. It just seems to easy. Both killers gone in two days thanks to a lucky lynch and then a "reveal".

Granted that the day one lynch was pretty lucky, but Rashan would likely have been lynched today anyway. The "Both killers" bit looks like you know there are only two killers. How do you know there are only two killers?

[Emurlahn]

Serc, on Nov 12 2008, 03:28 PM, said:

Galain, on Nov 12 2008, 03:24 PM, said:

Serc, on Nov 12 2008, 05:22 PM, said:

I don't like this. Not one bit.

Man, you really are paranoid.

Tennes reveals a story where's he's 100% sure Rashan is killer.

This is a CF game, it's day 2, we already nailed a killer. Watchugo'ondo?

Of course I'm paranoid. Its Mafia, not a tea party.
"Sticking feathers up your butt does not make you a chicken."
Saying you are a vig and that you have a partner does not make it true.
I'd like to draw everyone's attention to JA's vig reveal in 32. We can't take every reveal as gospel.

Editted for grammar

Yes but to reveal it like that this early in the game is sure to get him lynched if Rashan proves to be innocent. Also I think Fake reavealing when there is still about 18 (?)people left in the game is a bit ridiculous So at the moment I'm inclined to go for Rashan because of this.
vote Rashan

[Serc]

Telas, on Nov 12 2008, 03:42 PM, said:

Serc, on Nov 12 2008, 04:38 PM, said:

I'm considering lynching him now. A big, long convoluted explanation about a finder finding Rashan was a killer then his"last thoughts" being forwarded by PS to Tennes? It would have been simpler and less suspect to say "I vigged D'riss because I thought he was distancing from Ano".

I'll vote Rashan also, though. It just seems to easy. Both killers gone in two days thanks to a lucky lynch and then a "reveal".

Granted that the day one lynch was pretty lucky, but Rashan would likely have been lynched today anyway. The "Both killers" bit looks like you know there are only two killers. How do you know there are only two killers?

Weren't there only two Ivets in the opening?

[Galain]

The one little thing that "bugs" me in this story if that Rashan was already a good lynch candidate, so there was no point to the reveal, really.

Then again he's not revealing himself as the finder, just as a spent vig, so he's not a great loss to us if he gets NKed next.

The "paired" stuff I've seen before here, for example in the Coltaine game. As for the choice of find, Rashan was a natural one after the CF on Anomander.

[Shadow]

Serc, on Nov 12 2008, 10:44 AM, said:

Telas, on Nov 12 2008, 03:42 PM, said:

Serc, on Nov 12 2008, 04:38 PM, said:

I'm considering lynching him now. A big, long convoluted explanation about a finder finding Rashan was a killer then his"last thoughts" being forwarded by PS to Tennes? It would have been simpler and less suspect to say "I vigged D'riss because I thought he was distancing from Ano".

I'll vote Rashan also, though. It just seems to easy. Both killers gone in two days thanks to a lucky lynch and then a "reveal".

Granted that the day one lynch was pretty lucky, but Rashan would likely have been lynched today anyway. The "Both killers" bit looks like you know there are only two killers. How do you know there are only two killers?

Weren't there only two Ivets in the opening?

2 + Quinn.

[Tennes]

Serc, on Nov 12 2008, 03:44 PM, said:

Telas, on Nov 12 2008, 03:42 PM, said:

Serc, on Nov 12 2008, 04:38 PM, said:

I'm considering lynching him now. A big, long convoluted explanation about a finder finding Rashan was a killer then his"last thoughts" being forwarded by PS to Tennes? It would have been simpler and less suspect to say "I vigged D'riss because I thought he was distancing from Ano".

I'll vote Rashan also, though. It just seems to easy. Both killers gone in two days thanks to a lucky lynch and then a "reveal".

Granted that the day one lynch was pretty lucky, but Rashan would likely have been lynched today anyway. The "Both killers" bit looks like you know there are only two killers. How do you know there are only two killers?

Weren't there only two Ivets in the opening?

No their were 3 if you include Quinn...

Also If I was going to fake reveal then I would have made up a much less crazy story. Believe me. A physic dog would not have been my choice.

[Tennes]

Galain, on Nov 12 2008, 03:44 PM, said:

The one little thing that "bugs" me in this story if that Rashan was already a good lynch candidate, so there was no point to the reveal, really.

Then again he's not revealing himself as the finder, just as a spent vig, so he's not a great loss to us if he gets NKed next.

The "paired" stuff I've seen before here, for example in the Coltaine game. As for the choice of find, Rashan was a natural one after the CF on Anomander.

That is why I went ahead and revealed. If I was a finder I would have made a case.

[Serc]

Ah. I was assuming Quinn was not a killer. Then again, I suppose with three night kills, there has to be two killers left.

[Galain]

Shadow, on Nov 12 2008, 05:42 PM, said:

Wait a sec. You said you received the person he investigated, and the identity of his killer. Both were Rashan, yes?
Since you vigged D'riss, that means your dog was either Barghast or Tellan. Neither ever appeared on my radar (tellan only because of his admitted reluctance to play), so this is massive coincidence that the killer also went for that particular one. It sounds almost like a triggered kill or something (like the predator had in the Aliens game).

Did you receive the alignment: i.e. "Vorax was killed by Rashan, an Ivet", or just "Rashan is the one who killed your partner when he investigated him?" and you added yourself that the Ivets are the killers?

I doubt you'd make a reveal that you know is fucked up, but you may have received info that's not what you think it is, which could be costly.
Can't wait for what the CF is going to say.

Good points there, I didn't think of that. From his reveal it does say that his dog was killed by the one he investigated, hence my reaction comment.

It's a big coincidence if it's one, and I don't think a killer would automatically kill someone who does finds on him.

Although that would be the kind of stuff a cult leader might have, which would explain the third kill last night, and make this game the most fucking hilarious one in living memory

[Emurlahn]

Unless we have another vig who decided to go on day 1 personally I doubt this so I assume we've got 2 killers left who can both kill independently.

[Telas]

Tennes, on Nov 12 2008, 04:40 PM, said:

Vorax linked with me. Cause according to PS he was my bonded animal. <br /><br />I assume that he is a character from the book for those of you who know the book, my character is XXXXXXXXXXX


edit by mod - no names please

Quote

B11) Revealing the name of your character is expressly forbidden both in the living thread and in the beyond, doing so will result in a modkill and the removal of your player from both here and heaven.

Stick to your own rules and modkill him.