Anomander Rake picture: Badass
#41
Posted 07 September 2008 - 03:25 PM
That's the one! How could I forget that? No forum for a week and I'm all eek - wibble!!! :confused:
QUOTE (amphibian @ Nov 11 2008) <Rake himself was a huge weight inside Draconus and he didn't go in with an army.>
#42
Posted 07 September 2008 - 03:43 PM
Yeah, onracks art is really good. Second picture's sword is better, though i must admit I'v always thought dragnipur looked like ichigo's sword from Bleach.. Really big.. Dunno why.
#43
Posted 07 September 2008 - 05:39 PM
for some reason i had the same impression. maybe it's cuz they call it huge a lot. and it 'swallows light'. all very imposing.
#44
Posted 07 September 2008 - 06:19 PM
Doesn't GotM describe it as 6 and a half feet long.
Even if that's a GotMism... you can never escape that first impression.
Even if that's a GotMism... you can never escape that first impression.
Flying Monkeys definitely win.
#45
Posted 08 September 2008 - 06:09 AM
1st pics is the better one. There's no mystery about the 2nd 1. Because the face doesn't fit my perceived vision of what Rake should look like.
#46
Posted 08 September 2008 - 06:14 AM
The first one is my desktop.
'Nuff said.
'Nuff said.
***
Shinrei said:
<Vote Silencer> For not garnering any heat or any love for that matter. And I'm being serious here, it's like a mental block that is there, and you just keep forgetting it.
#47
Posted 08 September 2008 - 10:07 AM
yeah, 6 and a half feet is big, but it's not that big when you consider Rake is 7 foot tall.
I'm always puzzled why Rake is portrayed as so bulky when the Tiste Andii are consistently described as being tall and lithe.
I'm always puzzled why Rake is portrayed as so bulky when the Tiste Andii are consistently described as being tall and lithe.
I AM A TWAT
#48
Posted 08 September 2008 - 10:40 AM
Nooo Rake is heavily muscled.
Quote
The face remained blurred as always did; the Knight was naked, his skin jet black. From the hips up he was human, heavily muscled, holding aloft a black two-handed sword that trailed smoky, ethereal chains drifting off into the background's empty darkness. His lower body was draconian, its armoured scales black, paling to grey at the belly.
I play Neverland Online, a free browser MMORPG. :)
#49
Posted 08 September 2008 - 11:25 AM
That's a representation of him, not him, he doesn't have a Dragon arse in real life does he.
Second you can be muscular without being bulky, in loads of the pics he looks wide, his back is described as broad certainly but I doubt a date with Rake equals two tickets to the gun show.
Second you can be muscular without being bulky, in loads of the pics he looks wide, his back is described as broad certainly but I doubt a date with Rake equals two tickets to the gun show.
I AM A TWAT
#50
Posted 09 September 2008 - 02:13 AM
in my rarely humble opinion, the second picture isn't even close to Rake nor Dragnipur.
that looks more like Elric and Stormbringer on the juice...
that looks more like Elric and Stormbringer on the juice...
#51
Posted 09 September 2008 - 02:56 AM
Viandaran;378493 said:
in my rarely humble opinion, the second picture isn't even close to Rake nor Dragnipur.
that looks more like Elric and Stormbringer on the juice...
that looks more like Elric and Stormbringer on the juice...
I think it looks more like Morrolan from the Steven Brust Vlad Taltos books.
#52
Posted 09 September 2008 - 03:35 AM
Cougar;378174 said:
yeah, 6 and a half feet is big, but it's not that big when you consider Rake is 7 foot tall.
I'm always puzzled why Rake is portrayed as so bulky when the Tiste Andii are consistently described as being tall and lithe.
I'm always puzzled why Rake is portrayed as so bulky when the Tiste Andii are consistently described as being tall and lithe.
It might be that Rake is rarely ever shown in a scene with someone human as a benchmark. It's hard to convey "bigness" without something readily identifiable to show scale, so I bet most artists take the easy out with the muscles.
An interesting way to tackle this might be to do a picture of Rake in the crowd at the masquerade ending GotM. I volunteer Onrack. Nothing like coming up with an idea and making somebody else do the grunt work.
I survived the Permian and all I got was this t-shirt.
#53
Posted 09 September 2008 - 04:16 AM
I don't know if you're allowed to post Michael Kormack's art on the forum - I'd check with Pat if I were you.
For anyone who isn't aware, the first pic posted in this thread is from the cover of the Gardens of the Moon Limited/Lettered edition, available from Subterranean Press - see the Announcements thread in the General forum for further details and more sketches/artwork by this fantastic artist.
:angel:
For anyone who isn't aware, the first pic posted in this thread is from the cover of the Gardens of the Moon Limited/Lettered edition, available from Subterranean Press - see the Announcements thread in the General forum for further details and more sketches/artwork by this fantastic artist.
:angel:
*casting the shaved knuckle*
#54
Posted 09 September 2008 - 08:27 AM
amphibian;378503 said:
An interesting way to tackle this might be to do a picture of Rake in the crowd at the masquerade ending GotM. I volunteer Onrack. Nothing like coming up with an idea and making somebody else do the grunt work.
I was thinking of this very scene when I was trying to find a description of Rake. In this he is not remarked upon as being bizarrely large. I've seen plenty of tall people and if you saw someone 7ft tall and heavily muscled they would be collosal, I try to think of Rugby Union second row players when I think of Rake, top end of 6 feet tall, strong and muscular but their limbs still look long rather than bulky. Moreover, when you think of his Brother Silchas he is described as slender to the point of emaciation and is still fast and lethal like Rake, at this point I ask myself why would Rake need to have muscles like a powerlifter and where would he have got them. Anyone who says 'by magic' is getting a slap.
I AM A TWAT
#55
Posted 09 September 2008 - 09:30 AM
Cougar;378543 said:
I was thinking of this very scene when I was trying to find a description of Rake. In this he is not remarked upon as being bizarrely large. I've seen plenty of tall people and if you saw someone 7ft tall and heavily muscled they would be collosal, I try to think of Rugby Union second row players when I think of Rake, top end of 6 feet tall, strong and muscular but their limbs still look long rather than bulky. Moreover, when you think of his Brother Silchas he is described as slender to the point of emaciation and is still fast and lethal like Rake, at this point I ask myself why would Rake need to have muscles like a powerlifter and where would he have got them. Anyone who says 'by magic' is getting a slap.
Tossing around a six and a half foot lump of steel for a couple of years??
#56
Posted 09 September 2008 - 10:16 AM
Cougar;378174 said:
yeah, 6 and a half feet is big, but it's not that big when you consider Rake is 7 foot tall.
6 and a half feet just the blade.
#57
Posted 09 September 2008 - 10:49 AM
Yeah but the weight of the sword, ie: it cracking the flags near the end is obviously vastly more than a conventional musculature could handle, even Karsa for example, so Rake must be using Kurald Galain and/or Starvald Demalain to help support it.
I AM A TWAT
#58
Posted 09 September 2008 - 10:55 AM
Not to mention he would need magic to draw a sword that is as long as he is tall. Otherwise his arms would have to be freakishly long.
As for the card being a representation of Rake and not how he looks like for real, well that is possible but Paran's card is recognizably Paran so I have always thought that Rake's card would be recognizably him (except for the lower half).
As for the card being a representation of Rake and not how he looks like for real, well that is possible but Paran's card is recognizably Paran so I have always thought that Rake's card would be recognizably him (except for the lower half).
I play Neverland Online, a free browser MMORPG. :)
#59
Posted 09 September 2008 - 02:34 PM
meili;378562 said:
Not to mention he would need magic to draw a sword that is as long as he is tall. Otherwise his arms would have to be freakishly long.
As for the card being a representation of Rake and not how he looks like for real, well that is possible but Paran's card is recognizably Paran so I have always thought that Rake's card would be recognizably him (except for the lower half).
As for the card being a representation of Rake and not how he looks like for real, well that is possible but Paran's card is recognizably Paran so I have always thought that Rake's card would be recognizably him (except for the lower half).
The scabbard can be cut a certain ways up, so the sword stays in place (with a couple snaps up at the top) yet can slide out pretty easily. Lifting a sword like that over your head as if you were doing a military style up'n'over takes tremendous strength though. It is a fantasy series.
Paran's card has his feet pointing so tightly together that he looks like a sword. I think it's safe to say that the cards are more representational than accurate.
I survived the Permian and all I got was this t-shirt.
#60
Posted 09 September 2008 - 03:01 PM
When you spread your arms...from finger tip to finger tip is how tall you are.
So if rake is 7ft tall he can pull the scabbard down wile pulling the sword out and he would be able to pull it out.
So if rake is 7ft tall he can pull the scabbard down wile pulling the sword out and he would be able to pull it out.
...┌∩┐(◣_◢)┌∩┐...
Why dont they make the whole plane out of that black box stuff?
Why dont they make the whole plane out of that black box stuff?

Help






















