Gothos, on 27 June 2011 - 06:47 AM, said:
A virtual PC won't mean usable virtual processing power.
Good point.
Silencer, on 27 June 2011 - 07:01 AM, said:
As Gothos said, the hardware is simply lower end. For the same price as a fancy new iMac, you literally get twice or greater the amount of power in a PC.
Now, thanks to the Heel Face Turn that Apple made when they adopted Intel processors and graphics card, the old incompatibility issues are not as prevalent as they once were - but up until recent years, say over the last five or six, Apple used to use different hardware entirely for their PCs, which led to a number of problems, especially for games, being unable to run on the machine, no matter the 'power' it had. This problem is still there in some ways due to the different architecture in the system, despite the hardware changes, leaving some games unusable to this day.
They're simply inferior for gaming, basically. Or you pay ridiculous prices for lower-than-top specs to be able to run modern games at decent rates, at least.
Until now, all my gaming I've done on a PC anyway, so I've never really given gaming on a Mac